|
Let’s face it, the issue of banks selling to credit unions has proven to be unfortunately durable, particularly on Capitol Hill. It came up early and often during the tax reform debate earlier this year; a number of credit union friends, particularly those with their hands on the pen as the One Big Beautiful Bill was being drafted, explicitly told credit union advocates that “you are going to have to deal with this. It’s not something that most of Congress agrees with credit unions on.” The banking industry is doing its best to keep this issue alive despite credit union transactions accounting for a whopping 0.3% of bank assets (see the recent ICBA study purporting to show a detrimental effect on local communities when a credit union provides a lifeline and replaces an otherwise-closing bank). Also see DCUC’s Jason Stverak’s excellent rebuttal, pointing out, among other things, that banks closed 1,700 branches between 2004–2018, while at the same time credit unions opened 1,700, often in underserved and rural areas. Credit unions don’t just talk the talk when it comes to serving the consumer marketplace; they walk the walk every day, meeting people where they live and work.
It’s about time that credit unions take the ample high ground available. Instead of this being a negative, we need to start reminding both lawmakers and the financial public what’s really going on here, namely, that a bank management has decided to voluntarily sell, accept the best offer, and a credit union is willing to step in and start providing a better deal for consumers. And the key is to involve third-party voices in the defense of what is really a win-win for consumers and small communities. Consider:
Comments are closed.
|
Categories
All
Archives
December 2025
|
RSS Feed